敬告欲做DOC 的制造商, 申请商, FCC相关公告...

木暮

遇到很多客户问我, 为什么我们要建议他们的无线产品的接收部分去做 ID, 或者申请台湾, HK的DOC, 这样会给他们增加成本, 问, 为什么大陆很多实验室都在出DOC, 为什么你们要这么做? 现在给大家做一个忠告和澄清: 根据我在FCC 网站查到的信息, 有如下一个提问:
How can it be determined that a specific test firm facility may be used for testing in support of a Declaration of Conformity (DoC) test report?
FCC 是这样解释的:
Per Section 2.948 (d) and (e) of the FCC rules, in order for a DoC test report to be acceptable for a product to be marketed in the U.S., the testing must be performed at an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited test firm that is recognized by the FCC.  

A list of recognized test firms appears on the FCC website at: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/TestFirmSearch.cfm
Select the "accredited" option to search for FCC recognized accredited test firms. For test firms that choose the "non-contract" option for their test site, the information regarding the FCC recognition is not publicly available.

For test firms outside the U.S., recognition is only possible for those test firms located in countries with which the U.S. has an operational Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA).

For a test firm that has multiple facilities, the specific test facility used for the DoC testing must be a location assessed as part of the ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, and the facility must be recognized by the FCC. Test facilities located in countries where the U.S. does not have an operational Telcom MRA are not recognized by the FCC. Therefore a test firm with facilities located in a country without an operational Telcom MRA may not use the facilities in the non-MRA country for DoC testing to FCC requirements.

这里面的关键词是: 2.948, Test Firms Qualified for DOC Test Reports, MRA, List of Test Firms

所以很明显, 你必须在具备以上所有条件的实验室测试并申请DOC, 但大陆和US 是没有MRA的, 也就是说, 虽然大陆有好几个实验室是在FCC list 下的, 但如果出具DOC, 仍是不合法的, 同时, 在2007年12月15日左右, FCC给了一个order 给各TCB, 大致内容是:
FCC had given the order that TCBs have to verify the DoC issue when the product combines DoC issue. I believe this is for preventing Chinese applicants using illegal DoC test report issued by any lab located in China
所以我们衷心的建议要做DOC的生产商或申请商, 请严把自己的认证关, 不要再乱做DOC了, 为了你们的长久利益, 为了中国企业的声誉, 让我们一起, 依法做好产品认证吧!

maggie.wen

[s:9] 这是偶滴第一次回帖。。。。。。

木暮

引用第2楼maggie.wen于2008-04-22 14:30发表的“”:
[s:9] 这是偶滴第一次回帖。。。。。。

哈哈 处女帖送我了啊 谢谢了啊! [s:10]

ellen

顶，目前由于中国没有与美国签订互认协议，确实在中国大陆没有资质作DOC，但是可以做VERIFICATION 和CERTIFICATION

云儿飞呀飞

[s:9]  从去年开始 FCC管制已经开始严格了 大家自觉自律啊

zkx2007

对 如果只是大陆实验室发的doc 都是不符合的 抓住都要死翘翘 [s:28]

grant

可以申请Part15B Grant WWW.tuv-sud.cn

marktin

[s:11]
问下,灯具去美国做FCC Part18是用VOC还是DOC?

chenqy_2002

引用第9楼marktin于2008-06-26 15:02发表的“”:
[s:11]
问下,灯具去美国做FCC Part18是用VOC还是DOC?

FCC part18是没有VOC的。

christy2006

国内认证市场很乱呐, [s:28]